[PATCH v2 3/8] dt-bindings: marvell: a38x: add solidrun armada 388 clearfog boards

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 24/12/2023 15:38, Josua Mayer wrote:
> Add DT compatible for SolidRun Armada-388 based Clearfog Base and Pro
> boards.
> 
> While they are just two variants, we have 3 device-tree:
> - armada-388-clearfog.dts
> - armada-388-clearfog-base.dts
> - armada-388-clearfog-pro.dts
> 
> While the first one is identical to the pro variant, the filename is
> not, and neither are the compatible strings.
> 
> The first is compatible to armada-380, 385, 388 and
> solidrun,clearfog-a1.
> The other two are compatible to the same, plus an additional string
> including the pro/base as suffix.
> 
> Add two bindings, one for the explicit pro and base variants using a
> total of 5 compatibles, and one for the generic name using just 4.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua at solid-run.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/arm/marvell/armada-38x.yaml      | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-38x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-38x.yaml
> index 5bc69c4fe34d..25c29b466094 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-38x.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-38x.yaml
> @@ -38,4 +38,24 @@ properties:
>            - const: marvell,armada385
>            - const: marvell,armada380
>  
> +      - description: |
> +          SolidRun Armada 388 SoM based clearfog board. This is
> +          equivalent to clearfog pro, but lacks the "pro" label
> +          in dtb filename and compatible strings.
> +        items:
> +          - const: solidrun,clearfog-a1

SoM cannot be alone.

> +          - const: marvell,armada388
> +          - const: marvell,armada385
> +          - const: marvell,armada380
> +
> +      - description: SolidRun Armada 388 SoM based clearfog board variants
> +        items:
> +          - enum:
> +             - solidrun,clearfog-base-a1

Board has name "base"?

Still not tested...

Best regards,
Krzysztof