[PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API

[Vadim Fedorenko]

On 15/08/2023 03:45, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:03:31 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Kconfig
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Makefile
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dpll.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/dpll.h
>>   create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
> 
> Feels like we're lacking tests here. Is there a common subset of
> stuff we can expect reasonable devices to support?
> Anything you used in development that can be turned into tests?

Well, we were playing with the tool ynl/cli.py and it's stated in
the cover letter. But needs proper hardware to run. I'm not sure
we can easily create emulation device to run tests.