[PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API
Jakub Kicinski
kuba at kernel.org
Mon Aug 14 19:45:28 PDT 2023
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:03:31 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> create mode 100644 Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dpll.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/dpll.h
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
Feels like we're lacking tests here. Is there a common subset of
stuff we can expect reasonable devices to support?
Anything you used in development that can be turned into tests?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list