[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: Allow decimal format in addition to hex format

[Tony Lindgren]

* Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> [221121 16:05]:
> On 21/11/2022 15:48, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> [221121 14:30]:
> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>> Let's allow node numbering in decimal format too.
> >>>
> >>> Simple human-readable increments/IDs are usually decimal, hex is only for
> >>> addresses as noted by Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> >>> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml
> >>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ select: false
> >>>  
> >>>  properties:
> >>>    $nodename:
> >>> -    pattern: "^pwm(@.*|-[0-9a-f])*$"
> >>> +    pattern: "^pwm(@.*|-([0-9a-f]|1[0-5]))*$"
> >>
> >> I wonder why you don't make this:
> >>
> >> +    pattern: "^pwm(@.*|-[0-9a-f]*)$"
> 
> Yes, the '*' should be within ().

Sorry I guess I don't follow. So for what type of naming is the second '*'
actually needed here, or is it needed at all?

We only want to match the following:

pwm at 1234

pwm-0
...
pwm-f

And now also:

pwm-0
...
pwm-15

Is there yet another format I'm missing?

> > Hmm but I think this would also pass for node names like pwm-a-foo?
> > 
> 
> No, how?

Because of the second extra '*' there :)

Regards,

Tony