[PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: arm-smmu-impl: Add QDU1000 and QRU1000 iommu implementation

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/11/2022 15:42, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 03:28:15PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/10/2022 21:05, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>> Add compatible for Qualcomm QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs to add iommu
>>> support for them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera at quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> index b2708de25ea3..0580a381a04b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_create(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>>>  static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
>>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2" },
>>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500" },
>>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-smmu-500" },
>>
>> The patch was applied but it contradicts work here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221102184420.534094-12-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/
>> which explicitly asks not to add such compatibles...
> 
> Sure, but we've been adding new compatibles for years so I don't mind
> picking up the last few now before we stop accepting new ones.
> 
> I already asked Dmitry to respin his series as there are some open comments
> from others anyway.

OK. This also solves my other comment for other patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof