[PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Handle various PD configurations

[Alexander Stein]

Hi Marek,

Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2022, 22:57:28 CET schrieb Marek Vasut:
> The i.MX SoCs have various power domain configurations routed into
> the PCIe IP. MX6SX is the only one which contains 2 domains and also
> uses power-domain-names. MX6QDL do not use any domains. All the rest
> uses one domain and does not use power-domain-names anymore.
> 
> Document all those configurations in the DT binding document.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> ---
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx at nxp.com>
> To: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  .../bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml          | 47 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml index
> 1cfea8ca72576..fc8d4d7b80b38 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml
> @@ -68,19 +68,6 @@ properties:
>      description: A phandle to an fsl,imx7d-pcie-phy node. Additional
>        required properties for imx7d-pcie and imx8mq-pcie.
> 
> -  power-domains:
> -    items:
> -      - description: The phandle pointing to the DISPLAY domain for
> -          imx6sx-pcie, to PCIE_PHY power domain for imx7d-pcie and
> -          imx8mq-pcie.
> -      - description: The phandle pointing to the PCIE_PHY power domains
> -          for imx6sx-pcie.
> -
> -  power-domain-names:
> -    items:
> -      - const: pcie
> -      - const: pcie_phy
> -
>    resets:
>      maxItems: 3
>      description: Phandles to PCIe-related reset lines exposed by SRC
> @@ -241,6 +228,40 @@ allOf:
>                  - const: pcie_bus
>                  - const: pcie_phy
> 
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            const: fsl,imx6sx-pcie
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        power-domains:
> +          items:
> +            - description: The phandle pointing to the DISPLAY domain for
> +                imx6sx-pcie, to PCIE_PHY power domain for imx7d-pcie and
> +                imx8mq-pcie.
> +            - description: The phandle pointing to the PCIE_PHY power
> domains +                for imx6sx-pcie.
> +        power-domain-names:
> +          items:
> +            - const: pcie
> +            - const: pcie_phy
> +    else:
> +      if:
> +        not:
> +          properties:
> +            compatible:
> +              contains:
> +                enum:
> +                  - fsl,imx6q-pcie
> +                  - fsl,imx6qp-pcie
> +      then:
> +        properties:
> +          power-domains:
> +            description: |
> +               The phandle pointing to the DISPLAY domain for imx6sx-pcie,
> to +               PCIE_PHY power domain for imx7d-pcie and imx8mq-pcie. +

Doesn't it makes more sense to keep the power-domains descriptions in the 
common part on top, as before, but adjust minItems/maxItems for each 
compatible?

Regards,
Alexander

>  examples:
>    - |
>      #include <dt-bindings/clock/imx6qdl-clock.h>