[PATCH] clk: at91: generated: consider range when calculating best rate

Stephen Boyd sboyd at kernel.org
Tue May 17 00:14:38 PDT 2022


Quoting Codrin.Ciubotariu at microchip.com (2022-04-26 00:24:15)
> On 22.04.2022 04:12, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Codrin Ciubotariu (2022-04-13 00:13:18)
> >> clk_generated_best_diff() helps in finding the parent and the divisor to
> >> compute a rate closest to the required one. However, it doesn't take into
> >> account the request's range for the new rate. Make sure the new rate
> >> is within the required range.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 8a8f4bf0c480 ("clk: at91: clk-generated: create function to find best_diff")
> >> Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu at microchip.com>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Is this fixing anything real or it's just a thing that you noticed and
> > sent a patch to fix?
> 
> It fixes the clk_set_min/max_rate() calls to a generated clock. Do you 
> want me to add this fact in the commit description?
> 

I wanted to know if there are clk_set_min/max_rate() calls on this clk.
Are there?



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list