[PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings: Arm CoreSight binding schema conversions

Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier at linaro.org
Wed Jun 29 09:28:31 PDT 2022


On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:01:18PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:55:41AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 08:19:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > This series converts all the CoreSight debug bindings to DT schema
> > > format. These bindings are at the top of the list of occurrences of
> > > bindings without a schema. For arm64 dts files:
> > > 
> > >     702 ['arm,coresight-etm4x', 'arm,primecell']
> > >     536 ['arm,coresight-cpu-debug', 'arm,primecell']
> > >     509 ['arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel', 'arm,primecell']
> > >     213 ['arm,coresight-tmc', 'arm,primecell']
> > >     143 ['arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator', 'arm,primecell']
> > >      97 ['arm,coresight-stm', 'arm,primecell']
> > > 
> > > I'll send a reply to these with the errors in dts files that this
> > > causes. I've reviewed them and they all look legit. Xilinx Zynq though
> > > has 3 clocks instead of 2.
> > > 
> > > v2:
> > >  - Rename other Coresight bindings to use compatible string for filename
> > >  - Add missing arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator.yaml and
> > >    arm,coresight-static-funnel.yaml
> > >  - Update MAINTAINERS
> > >  - Fix coresight.txt references
> > 
> > What a massive undertaking... I have looked scrupulously and everything adds up.
> > Let me know if you were looking for me to pick this up.  Otherwise:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
> 
> Can you apply. I think there was another series from QCom touching 
> the MAINTAINERS entry that will conflict.

I just tried a rebased on today's linux-next and it didn't blow up.

> 
> There's a couple of indentation fixups. Can you fix when applying or do 
> you want me to resend?

Fixed and applied.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> 
> Rob



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list