[PATCH v2 0/3] dt-bindings: Arm CoreSight binding schema conversions

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:55:41AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 08:19:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > This series converts all the CoreSight debug bindings to DT schema
> > format. These bindings are at the top of the list of occurrences of
> > bindings without a schema. For arm64 dts files:
> > 
> >     702 ['arm,coresight-etm4x', 'arm,primecell']
> >     536 ['arm,coresight-cpu-debug', 'arm,primecell']
> >     509 ['arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel', 'arm,primecell']
> >     213 ['arm,coresight-tmc', 'arm,primecell']
> >     143 ['arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator', 'arm,primecell']
> >      97 ['arm,coresight-stm', 'arm,primecell']
> > 
> > I'll send a reply to these with the errors in dts files that this
> > causes. I've reviewed them and they all look legit. Xilinx Zynq though
> > has 3 clocks instead of 2.
> > 
> > v2:
> >  - Rename other Coresight bindings to use compatible string for filename
> >  - Add missing arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator.yaml and
> >    arm,coresight-static-funnel.yaml
> >  - Update MAINTAINERS
> >  - Fix coresight.txt references
> 
> What a massive undertaking... I have looked scrupulously and everything adds up.
> Let me know if you were looking for me to pick this up.  Otherwise:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>

Can you apply. I think there was another series from QCom touching 
the MAINTAINERS entry that will conflict. 

There's a couple of indentation fixups. Can you fix when applying or do 
you want me to resend?

Rob