[PATCH v4 19/26] arm64: kaslr: defer initialization to late initcall where permitted
Ard Biesheuvel
ardb at kernel.org
Fri Jun 24 06:09:03 PDT 2022
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 15:08, Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:45:43PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > The early KASLR init code runs extremely early, and anything that could
> > be deferred until later should be. So let's defer the randomization of
> > the module region until much later - this also simplifies the
> > arithmetic, given that we no longer have to reason about the link time
> > vs load time placement of the core kernel explicitly. Also get rid of
> > the global status variable, and infer the status reported by the
> > diagnostic print from other KASLR related context.
> >
> > While at it, get rid of the special case for KASAN without
> > KASAN_VMALLOC, which never occurs in practice.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c | 95 +++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -163,33 +169,12 @@ u64 __init kaslr_early_init(void)
> > * when ARM64_MODULE_PLTS is enabled.
> > */
> > module_range = MODULES_VSIZE - (u64)(_etext - _stext);
> > - module_alloc_base = (u64)_etext + offset - MODULES_VSIZE;
> > }
> >
> > /* use the lower 21 bits to randomize the base of the module region */
> > module_alloc_base += (module_range * (seed & ((1 << 21) - 1))) >> 21;
> > module_alloc_base &= PAGE_MASK;
> >
> > - return offset;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int __init kaslr_init(void)
> > -{
> > - switch (kaslr_status) {
> > - case KASLR_ENABLED:
> > - pr_info("KASLR enabled\n");
> > - break;
> > - case KASLR_DISABLED_CMDLINE:
> > - pr_info("KASLR disabled on command line\n");
> > - break;
> > - case KASLR_DISABLED_NO_SEED:
> > - pr_warn("KASLR disabled due to lack of seed\n");
> > - break;
> > - case KASLR_DISABLED_FDT_REMAP:
> > - pr_warn("KASLR disabled due to FDT remapping failure\n");
> > - break;
> > - }
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -core_initcall(kaslr_init)
> > +late_initcall(kaslr_init)
>
> Are you sure this isn't too late? I'm nervous that we might have called
> request_module() off the back of all the other initcalls that we've run by
> this point.
>
Yeah, I just realized the other day that this is probably too late.
subsys_initcall() might be more suitable here
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list