[PATCH v4 19/26] arm64: kaslr: defer initialization to late initcall where permitted
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Fri Jun 24 06:08:09 PDT 2022
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:45:43PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The early KASLR init code runs extremely early, and anything that could
> be deferred until later should be. So let's defer the randomization of
> the module region until much later - this also simplifies the
> arithmetic, given that we no longer have to reason about the link time
> vs load time placement of the core kernel explicitly. Also get rid of
> the global status variable, and infer the status reported by the
> diagnostic print from other KASLR related context.
>
> While at it, get rid of the special case for KASAN without
> KASAN_VMALLOC, which never occurs in practice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c | 95 +++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
[...]
> @@ -163,33 +169,12 @@ u64 __init kaslr_early_init(void)
> * when ARM64_MODULE_PLTS is enabled.
> */
> module_range = MODULES_VSIZE - (u64)(_etext - _stext);
> - module_alloc_base = (u64)_etext + offset - MODULES_VSIZE;
> }
>
> /* use the lower 21 bits to randomize the base of the module region */
> module_alloc_base += (module_range * (seed & ((1 << 21) - 1))) >> 21;
> module_alloc_base &= PAGE_MASK;
>
> - return offset;
> -}
> -
> -static int __init kaslr_init(void)
> -{
> - switch (kaslr_status) {
> - case KASLR_ENABLED:
> - pr_info("KASLR enabled\n");
> - break;
> - case KASLR_DISABLED_CMDLINE:
> - pr_info("KASLR disabled on command line\n");
> - break;
> - case KASLR_DISABLED_NO_SEED:
> - pr_warn("KASLR disabled due to lack of seed\n");
> - break;
> - case KASLR_DISABLED_FDT_REMAP:
> - pr_warn("KASLR disabled due to FDT remapping failure\n");
> - break;
> - }
> -
> return 0;
> }
> -core_initcall(kaslr_init)
> +late_initcall(kaslr_init)
Are you sure this isn't too late? I'm nervous that we might have called
request_module() off the back of all the other initcalls that we've run by
this point.
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list