[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: ti: pruss: Update bindings for K3 AM62x SoCs

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 16/05/22 20:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/05/2022 14:33, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 28/04/22 11:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 27/04/2022 09:27, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> Update the PRUSS bindings for the PRUSSM instance present in
>>>> AM625 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml | 1 +
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>> index 64461d432004..cf13e5179657 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ properties:
>>>>        - ti,am654-icssg   # for K3 AM65x SoC family
>>>>        - ti,j721e-icssg   # for K3 J721E SoC family
>>>>        - ti,am642-icssg   # for K3 AM64x SoC family
>>>> +      - ti,am625-pruss   # for K3 AM62x SoC family
>>>>  
>>>
>>> Looks like out of order (although for some reason before it was also
>>> misordered...).
>>
>> These are really in the chronological order of the introduction of SoCs.
>> Isn't that okay to have?
> 
> You mean order of release on the market of order of adding files here?
> The first is ok, the latter would mean there is no order at all.

I meant order of release to market. Anyways, I'll send a patch to change
the order to alphabetic order.

Thanks,
Kishon