[PATCH V2 2/6] spi: mediatek: add IPM single mode design support
Leilk Liu
leilk.liu at mediatek.com
Tue Feb 22 17:51:44 PST 2022
On Tue, 2022-02-22 at 11:09 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 21/02/22 05:07, Leilk Liu ha scritto:
> > this patch add the support of IPM single mode design.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leilk Liu <leilk.liu at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > -----
> > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c
> > index bbfeb8046c17..5fa677a589a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> > #define SPI_CFG2_REG 0x0028
> > #define SPI_TX_SRC_REG_64 0x002c
> > #define SPI_RX_DST_REG_64 0x0030
> > +#define SPI_CFG3_IPM_REG 0x0040
> >
> > #define SPI_CFG0_SCK_HIGH_OFFSET 0
> > #define SPI_CFG0_SCK_LOW_OFFSET 8
> > @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@
> > #define SPI_CFG1_CS_IDLE_MASK 0xff
> > #define SPI_CFG1_PACKET_LOOP_MASK 0xff00
> > #define SPI_CFG1_PACKET_LENGTH_MASK 0x3ff0000
> > +#define SPI_CFG1_IPM_PACKET_LENGTH_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> > #define SPI_CFG2_SCK_HIGH_OFFSET 0
> > #define SPI_CFG2_SCK_LOW_OFFSET 16
> >
> > @@ -68,7 +70,13 @@
> > #define SPI_CMD_TX_ENDIAN BIT(15)
> > #define SPI_CMD_FINISH_IE BIT(16)
> > #define SPI_CMD_PAUSE_IE BIT(17)
> > +#define SPI_CMD_IPM_NONIDLE_MODE BIT(19)
> > +#define SPI_CMD_IPM_SPIM_LOOP BIT(21)
> > +#define SPI_CMD_IPM_GET_TICKDLY_OFFSET 22
> >
> > +#define SPI_CMD_IPM_GET_TICKDLY_MASK GENMASK(24, 22)
> > +#define SPI_CFG3_IPM_HALF_DUPLEX_DIR BIT(2)
> > +#define SPI_CFG3_IPM_HALF_DUPLEX_EN BIT(3)
> > #define MT8173_SPI_MAX_PAD_SEL 3
> >
> > #define MTK_SPI_PAUSE_INT_STATUS 0x2
> > @@ -78,6 +86,7 @@
> >
> > #define MTK_SPI_MAX_FIFO_SIZE 32U
> > #define MTK_SPI_PACKET_SIZE 1024
> > +#define MTK_SPI_IPM_PACKET_SIZE SZ_64K
> > #define MTK_SPI_32BITS_MASK (0xffffffff)
> >
> > #define DMA_ADDR_EXT_BITS (36)
> > @@ -93,6 +102,9 @@ struct mtk_spi_compatible {
> > bool dma_ext;
> > /* some IC no need unprepare SPI clk */
> > bool no_need_unprepare;
> > + /* IPM design improve some single mode features */
> > + bool ipm_design;
> > +
> > };
> >
> > struct mtk_spi {
> > @@ -116,6 +128,12 @@ static const struct mtk_spi_compatible
> > mt2712_compat = {
> > .must_tx = true,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_spi_compatible ipm_compat_single = {
> > + .enhance_timing = true,
> > + .dma_ext = true,
> > + .ipm_design = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct mtk_spi_compatible mt6765_compat = {
> > .need_pad_sel = true,
> > .must_tx = true,
> > @@ -157,6 +175,9 @@ static const struct mtk_chip_config
> > mtk_default_chip_info = {
> > };
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id mtk_spi_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,ipm-spi-single",
> > + .data = (void *)&ipm_compat_single,
> > + },
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-spi",
> > .data = (void *)&mtk_common_compat,
> > },
> > @@ -275,12 +296,11 @@ static int mtk_spi_set_hw_cs_timing(struct
> > spi_device *spi)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int mtk_spi_prepare_message(struct spi_master *master,
> > - struct spi_message *msg)
> > +static int mtk_spi_hw_init(struct spi_master *master,
> > + struct spi_device *spi)
> > {
> > u16 cpha, cpol;
> > u32 reg_val;
> > - struct spi_device *spi = msg->spi;
> > struct mtk_chip_config *chip_config = spi->controller_data;
> > struct mtk_spi *mdata = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> >
> > @@ -288,6 +308,15 @@ static int mtk_spi_prepare_message(struct
> > spi_master *master,
> > cpol = spi->mode & SPI_CPOL ? 1 : 0;
> >
> > reg_val = readl(mdata->base + SPI_CMD_REG);
> > + if (mdata->dev_comp->ipm_design) {
> > + /* SPI transfer without idle time until packet length
> > done */
> > + reg_val |= SPI_CMD_IPM_NONIDLE_MODE;
> > + if (spi->mode & SPI_LOOP)
> > + reg_val |= SPI_CMD_IPM_SPIM_LOOP;
> > + else
> > + reg_val &= ~SPI_CMD_IPM_SPIM_LOOP;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (cpha)
> > reg_val |= SPI_CMD_CPHA;
> > else
> > @@ -344,18 +373,33 @@ static int mtk_spi_prepare_message(struct
> > spi_master *master,
> > writel(mdata->pad_sel[spi->chip_select],
> > mdata->base + SPI_PAD_SEL_REG);
> >
> > - /* tick delay */
> > - reg_val = readl(mdata->base + SPI_CFG1_REG);
> > - reg_val &= ~SPI_CFG1_GET_TICK_DLY_MASK;
> > - reg_val |= ((chip_config->tick_delay & 0x7)
> > - << SPI_CFG1_GET_TICK_DLY_OFFSET);
> > - writel(reg_val, mdata->base + SPI_CFG1_REG);
>
> Hello Leilk,
>
> with this change, you are excluding this code from MT2712: is that
> intentional?
> If it is, then this should reside in a different commit with a Fixes
> tag, also explaining the reason for not setting the tick delay on
> that SoC.
It's different for MT2712 and the other ICs for tick delay. I'll send a
patch with fixes tag, thanks
>
> Also, please don't remove the /* tick delay */ comment.
>
OK, I'll fix it,thanks
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
> > + if (mdata->dev_comp->enhance_timing) {
> > + if (mdata->dev_comp->ipm_design) {
> > + reg_val = readl(mdata->base + SPI_CMD_REG);
> > + reg_val &= ~SPI_CMD_IPM_GET_TICKDLY_MASK;
> > + reg_val |= ((chip_config->tick_delay & 0x7)
> > + << SPI_CMD_IPM_GET_TICKDLY_OFFSET);
> > + writel(reg_val, mdata->base + SPI_CMD_REG);
> > + } else {
> > + reg_val = readl(mdata->base + SPI_CFG1_REG);
> > + reg_val &= ~SPI_CFG1_GET_TICK_DLY_MASK;
> > + reg_val |= ((chip_config->tick_delay & 0x7)
> > + << SPI_CFG1_GET_TICK_DLY_OFFSET);
> > + writel(reg_val, mdata->base + SPI_CFG1_REG);
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > /* set hw cs timing */
> > mtk_spi_set_hw_cs_timing(spi);
> > return 0;
> > }
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list