[PATCH v3 3/3] memory: Add Broadcom STB memory controller driver
Florian Fainelli
f.fainelli at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 10:29:51 PDT 2022
On 8/9/22 02:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/08/2022 01:09, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Add support for configuring the Self Refresh Power Down (SRPD)
>> inactivity timeout on Broadcom STB chips. This is used to conserve power
>> when the DRAM activity is reduced.
>>
>
>
>> +static int __maybe_unused brcmstb_memc_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_memc *memc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + if (memc->timeout_cycles == 0)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return brcmstb_memc_srpd_config(memc, memc->timeout_cycles);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmstb_memc_pm_ops, brcmstb_memc_suspend,
>> + brcmstb_memc_resume);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver brcmstb_memc_driver = {
>> + .probe = brcmstb_memc_probe,
>> + .remove = brcmstb_memc_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "brcmstb_memc",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> No need, run coccinelle.
>
>> + .of_match_table = brcmstb_memc_of_match,
>> + .pm = &brcmstb_memc_pm_ops,
>
> Shouldn't this be pm_ptr()? and then no need for __maybe_unused in
> brcmstb_memc_resume/suspend.
How can one can remove __maybe_unused without causing a warning for the
CONFIG_PM=n case, not that I needed to build to convince myself, but
still did anyway:
drivers/memory/brcmstb_memc.c:275:12: warning: 'brcmstb_memc_resume'
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int brcmstb_memc_resume(struct device *dev)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/memory/brcmstb_memc.c:252:12: warning: 'brcmstb_memc_suspend'
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int brcmstb_memc_suspend(struct device *dev)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
unless you also implied enclosing those functions under an #if
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM) or something which is IMHO less preferable.
--
Florian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list