[PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Tony Lindgren]

* Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com> [220422 18:37]:
> On 06:30-20220418, cgel.zte at gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
> > 
> > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> > for simplifing code
> > 
> > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci at zte.com.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
> 
> Tony: Could you check?

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at aotmide.com>