[PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

cgel.zte at gmail.com cgel.zte at gmail.com
Sun Apr 17 23:30:59 PDT 2022


From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci at zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
index 7bab4bbaf02d..ce09c42eaed2 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
@@ -555,11 +555,9 @@ static int am33xx_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
 
 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_pm_runtime_disable;
-	}
 
 	ret = pm_ops->init(am33xx_do_sram_idle);
 	if (ret) {
-- 
2.25.1





More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list