[PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem to json schema

[Sudeep Holla]

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 03:25:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Move the SRAM and shared memory binding for SCPI into the existing
> > Generic on-chip SRAM. We just need to update the compatible list and
> > there-by remove the whole old text format binding for the same.
> > 
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman at baylibre.com>
> > Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>
> > Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet at baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt          | 15 ---------------
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml  |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
> > index bcd6c3ec471e..bcb8b3d61e68 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
> > @@ -56,21 +56,6 @@ Sub-nodes
> >  	node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of identifiers
> >  	into the clock-output-names array.
> >  
> > -SRAM and Shared Memory for SCPI
> > --------------------------------
> > -
> > -A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCPI communication between application
> > -processors and SCP.
> > -
> > -The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3]
> > -
> > -Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCPI.
> > -
> > -Required sub-node properties:
> > -- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM
> > -- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based
>
> > +            - arm,scpi-shmem
>
> Which is correct? There's not a single other occurrance in the kernel 
> tree of either.
>

Right I was thinking removing it but wasn't sure if any downstream DTS
have used this as it has been in the binding for a while now.

--
Regards,
Sudeep