[PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem to json schema

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Move the SRAM and shared memory binding for SCPI into the existing
> Generic on-chip SRAM. We just need to update the compatible list and
> there-by remove the whole old text format binding for the same.
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman at baylibre.com>
> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>
> Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet at baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt          | 15 ---------------
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml  |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
> index bcd6c3ec471e..bcb8b3d61e68 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
> @@ -56,21 +56,6 @@ Sub-nodes
>  	node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of identifiers
>  	into the clock-output-names array.
>  
> -SRAM and Shared Memory for SCPI
> --------------------------------
> -
> -A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCPI communication between application
> -processors and SCP.
> -
> -The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3]
> -
> -Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCPI.
> -
> -Required sub-node properties:
> -- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM
> -- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based

> +            - arm,scpi-shmem

Which is correct? There's not a single other occurrance in the kernel 
tree of either.

Rob