[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-main: Add ICSSG nodes

[Nishanth Menon]

On 09:43-20210121, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 1/21/21 9:37 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 13:48-20210114, Suman Anna wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> >> +
> >> +		icssg1_intc: interrupt-controller at 20000 {
> >> +			compatible = "ti,icssg-intc";
> >> +			reg = <0x20000 0x2000>;
> >> +			interrupt-controller;
> >> +			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> >> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 262 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> >> +				     <GIC_SPI 263 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> >> +				     <GIC_SPI 264 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> >> +				     <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> >> +				     <GIC_SPI 266 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> >> +				     <GIC_SPI 267 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> >> +				     <GIC_SPI 268 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> >> +				     <GIC_SPI 269 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >> +			interrupt-names = "host_intr0", "host_intr1",
> >> +					  "host_intr2", "host_intr3",
> >> +					  "host_intr4", "host_intr5",
> >> +					  "host_intr6", "host_intr7";
> > 
> > 
> > Could you look at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/rbZrv3sDFk/
> > 
> 
> Yes, I am aware of these, and I have already noted it in my cover-letter.
> "Note that the interrupt nodes will generate a warning about missing
> '#address-cells' when compiled using W=2, but adding that currently
> fails the dtbs_check, so going with the dt binding compliance."
> 
> I have submitted two incremental patches, one against the binding [1] and
> another against dts [2].
> 
> regards
> Suman
> 
> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20210115205819.19426-1-s-anna@ti.com/
> [2]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20210115210625.20427-1-s-anna@ti.com/


Aah.. I missed it..  thanks, will remove from my queue.. please post once things are
cleanedup and ready..

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D