[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-main: Add ICSSG nodes

Suman Anna s-anna at ti.com
Thu Jan 21 10:43:06 EST 2021


On 1/21/21 9:37 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 13:48-20210114, Suman Anna wrote:
> [...]
> 
>> +
>> +		icssg1_intc: interrupt-controller at 20000 {
>> +			compatible = "ti,icssg-intc";
>> +			reg = <0x20000 0x2000>;
>> +			interrupt-controller;
>> +			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 262 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 263 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 264 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 266 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 267 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 268 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 269 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +			interrupt-names = "host_intr0", "host_intr1",
>> +					  "host_intr2", "host_intr3",
>> +					  "host_intr4", "host_intr5",
>> +					  "host_intr6", "host_intr7";
> 
> 
> Could you look at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/rbZrv3sDFk/
> 

Yes, I am aware of these, and I have already noted it in my cover-letter.
"Note that the interrupt nodes will generate a warning about missing
'#address-cells' when compiled using W=2, but adding that currently
fails the dtbs_check, so going with the dt binding compliance."

I have submitted two incremental patches, one against the binding [1] and
another against dts [2].

regards
Suman

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20210115205819.19426-1-s-anna@ti.com/
[2]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20210115210625.20427-1-s-anna@ti.com/



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list