[PATCH] soc: ti: smartreflex: Use platform_get_irq_optional() to get the interrupt
Nishanth Menon
nm at ti.com
Mon Dec 20 05:31:45 PST 2021
On 15:39-20211218, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
> allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
> when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
> in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the
> irq chaining.
>
> In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
> code use platform_get_irq_optional().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj at bp.renesas.com>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> Dropping usage of platform_get_resource() was agreed based on
> the discussion [0].
>
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/
> patch/20211209001056.29774-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj at bp.renesas.com/
>
> Cheers,
> Prabhakar
> ---
> drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c b/drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c
> index b5b2fa538d5c..4f311e00fa46 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c
> @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int omap_sr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct omap_sr *sr_info;
> struct omap_sr_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> - struct resource *mem, *irq;
> + struct resource *mem;
> struct dentry *nvalue_dir;
> int i, ret = 0;
>
> @@ -844,7 +844,12 @@ static int omap_sr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(sr_info->base))
> return PTR_ERR(sr_info->base);
>
> - irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> + ret = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
> + if (ret <= 0 && ret != -ENXIO)
> + return ret ? ret : -ENXIO;
^^ minor: This is a better check compared to what existed, might be good
to add that to commit message, also does this cause the driver to fail
probe silently?
> + if (ret > 0)
> + sr_info->irq = ret;
> + ret = 0;
>
> sr_info->fck = devm_clk_get(pdev->dev.parent, "fck");
> if (IS_ERR(sr_info->fck))
> @@ -870,9 +875,6 @@ static int omap_sr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> sr_info->autocomp_active = false;
> sr_info->ip_type = pdata->ip_type;
>
> - if (irq)
> - sr_info->irq = irq->start;
> -
> sr_set_clk_length(sr_info);
>
> list_add(&sr_info->node, &sr_list);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Otherwise, looks fine to me. but it is a little late since I have sent out my
5.17 PR. We can try for rc OR 5.18.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D)/Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list