[PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema

[Lee Jones]

On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Florian Fainelli wrote:

> On 12/6/21 1:05 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > 
> >> On 06.12.2021 09:44, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >>>> On 15.11.2021 06:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >>>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This helps validating DTS files.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not familiar with handling multi-subsystem patchsets (here: watchdog
> >>>> & MFD).
> >>>>
> >>>> Please kindly let me know: how to proceed with this patchset now to get
> >>>> it queued for Linus?
> >>>
> >>> What is the requirement for these to be merged together?
> >>
> >> If you merge 2/2 without 1/2 then people running "make dt_binding_check"
> >> may see 1 extra warning until both patches meet in Linus's tree.
> >>
> >> So it all comes to how much you care about amount of warnings produced
> >> by "dt_binding_check".
> > 
> > In -next, I don't, but I know Rob gets excited about it.
> > 
> > Rob, what is your final word on this?  Is it a forced requirement for
> > all interconnected document changes to go in together?
> 
> The first patch is queued up in Guenter's watchdog tree here:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git/commit/?h=watchdog-next&id=a5b2ebc8f6e67b5c81023e8bde6b19ff48ffdb02
> 
> and will be submitted to Wim shortly I believe, so I suppose we should
> take patch #2 via Guenter and Wim's tree as well logically.

If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog