[PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema

[Florian Fainelli]

On 12/6/21 1:05 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 
>> On 06.12.2021 09:44, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> On 15.11.2021 06:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
>>>>>
>>>>> This helps validating DTS files.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
>>>>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not familiar with handling multi-subsystem patchsets (here: watchdog
>>>> & MFD).
>>>>
>>>> Please kindly let me know: how to proceed with this patchset now to get
>>>> it queued for Linus?
>>>
>>> What is the requirement for these to be merged together?
>>
>> If you merge 2/2 without 1/2 then people running "make dt_binding_check"
>> may see 1 extra warning until both patches meet in Linus's tree.
>>
>> So it all comes to how much you care about amount of warnings produced
>> by "dt_binding_check".
> 
> In -next, I don't, but I know Rob gets excited about it.
> 
> Rob, what is your final word on this?  Is it a forced requirement for
> all interconnected document changes to go in together?

The first patch is queued up in Guenter's watchdog tree here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git/commit/?h=watchdog-next&id=a5b2ebc8f6e67b5c81023e8bde6b19ff48ffdb02

and will be submitted to Wim shortly I believe, so I suppose we should
take patch #2 via Guenter and Wim's tree as well logically.
-- 
Florian