[PATCH 3/3] thermal: armada: add support for CP110

Baruch Siach baruch at tkos.co.il
Wed Nov 22 09:41:59 PST 2017


Hi Eduardo,

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:23:36AM -0800, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:42:05PM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > The CP110 component is integrated in the Armada 8k and 7k lines of processors.
> > 
> > This patch also adds an option of offset to the MSB of the control
> > register. The existing DT binding for Armada 38x refers to a single 32 bit
> > control register. It turns out that this is actually only the MSB of the
> > control area. Changing the binding to fix that would break existing DT files,
> > so the Armada 38x binding is left as is.
> > 
> > The new CP110 binding increases the size of the control area to 64 bits, thus
> > moving the MSB to offset 4.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> > index 1f7f81628040..542db578ce36 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct armada_thermal_data {
> >  	unsigned int temp_shift;
> >  	unsigned int temp_mask;
> >  	unsigned int is_valid_shift;
> > +	unsigned int control_msb_offset;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static void armadaxp_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > @@ -141,12 +142,14 @@ static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  				  struct armada_thermal_priv *priv)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long reg = readl_relaxed(priv->control);
> > +	void __iomem *control_msb =
> > +		priv->control + priv->data->control_msb_offset;
> > +	unsigned long reg = readl_relaxed(control_msb);
> 
> Will existing users of this function work with default
> control_msb_offset? presumably 0, right?

Of course. With control_msb_offset=0, this hunk is a nop. All 
armada_thermal_data instances are static, so any field that is not explicitly 
set should be initialized to zero. The code already relies on this behaviour 
for the is_valid field.

baruch

> >  	/* Reset hardware once */
> >  	if (!(reg & A380_HW_RESET)) {
> >  		reg |= A380_HW_RESET;
> > -		writel(reg, priv->control);
> > +		writel(reg, control_msb);
> >  		mdelay(10);
> >  	}
> >  }
> > @@ -258,6 +261,19 @@ static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_ap806_data = {
> >  	.inverted = true,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct armada_thermal_data armada_cp110_data = {
> > +	.is_valid = armada_is_valid,
> > +	.init_sensor = armada380_init_sensor,
> > +	.is_valid_shift = 10,
> > +	.temp_shift = 0,
> > +	.temp_mask = 0x3ff,
> > +	.control_msb_offset = 4,
> > +	.coef_b = 1172499100UL,
> > +	.coef_m = 2000096UL,
> > +	.coef_div = 4201,
> > +	.inverted = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct of_device_id armada_thermal_id_table[] = {
> >  	{
> >  		.compatible = "marvell,armadaxp-thermal",
> > @@ -279,6 +295,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id armada_thermal_id_table[] = {
> >  		.compatible = "marvell,armada-ap806-thermal",
> >  		.data       = &armada_ap806_data,
> >  	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "marvell,armada-cp110-thermal",
> > +		.data       = &armada_cp110_data,
> > +	},
> >  	{
> >  		/* sentinel */
> >  	},

-- 
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list