[PATCH v2 4/7] mfd: syscon: atmel-smc: Remove unused helpers/macros
nicolas.ferre at atmel.com
Mon Mar 27 02:25:47 PDT 2017
Le 16/03/2017 à 13:18, Lee Jones a écrit :
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> Hi Lee,
>> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:16:27 +0000
>> Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>>> All macros prefixed with AT91[SAM9]_SMC have been replaced by equivalent
>>>> definitions prefixed with ATMEL_SMC, and the at91sam9_smc_xxxx() helpers
>>>> are no longer used.
>>>> Drop these definitions before someone starts using them again.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
>>>> include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-smc.h | 152 -----------------------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 152 deletions(-)
>>> For my own reference:
>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
>>> What is the plan for this set?
>>> I only see 2 patches.
>> You mean, you only see 2 patches in your Inbox (that would be weird,
>> because you're in the CC list of all patches), or only 2 patches that
>> should go in your tree?
> I meant the former, but another pull down of my mail grabbed the
> remaining patches.
>>> Can they both be applied?
>> All patches should go through the same tree, because changes in
>> drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c are depending on changes done in the MFD
>> If Nicolas is okay with that, maybe you can take everything through the
>> MFD tree (I don't expect any conflicts in drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c).
> That would be okay by me.
Yes I'm okay with that.
Thanks Lee for your support.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel