[PATCH v2 4/7] mfd: syscon: atmel-smc: Remove unused helpers/macros
lee.jones at linaro.org
Thu Mar 16 05:18:00 PDT 2017
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Lee,
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:16:27 +0000
> Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > All macros prefixed with AT91[SAM9]_SMC have been replaced by equivalent
> > > definitions prefixed with ATMEL_SMC, and the at91sam9_smc_xxxx() helpers
> > > are no longer used.
> > > Drop these definitions before someone starts using them again.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-smc.h | 152 -----------------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 152 deletions(-)
> > For my own reference:
> > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> > What is the plan for this set?
> > I only see 2 patches.
> You mean, you only see 2 patches in your Inbox (that would be weird,
> because you're in the CC list of all patches), or only 2 patches that
> should go in your tree?
I meant the former, but another pull down of my mail grabbed the
> > Can they both be applied?
> All patches should go through the same tree, because changes in
> drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c are depending on changes done in the MFD
> If Nicolas is okay with that, maybe you can take everything through the
> MFD tree (I don't expect any conflicts in drivers/memory/atmel-ebi.c).
That would be okay by me.
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel