[PATCH v3 11/13] pinctrl: samsung: Move retention control from mach-exynos to the pinctrl driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski at samsung.com> wrote:
>> On 2017-01-26 10:10, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Marek Szyprowski
>>> <m.szyprowski at samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This patch moves pad retention control from PMU driver to Exynos pin
>>>> controller driver. This helps to avoid possible ordering and logical
>>>> dependencies between machine, PMU and pin control code. Till now it
>>>> worked fine only because sys_ops for PMU and pin controller were called
>>>> in registration order.
>>>> This is also a preparation for adding new features to Exynos pin
>>>> controller driver, like runtime power management and suspending
>>>> individual pin controllers, which might be a part of some power domain.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
>>>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c           |  64 --------------
>>>>   drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 145
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> This makes all kind of sense, but I would ideally like an ACK
>>> from the ARM SoC maintainer(s): Arnd, Olof, are you OK with
>>> this?
>>
>>
>> Isn't enough to have Krzysztof's (Exynos SoC maintainer) 'reviewed-by' tag?
>> I assume that 'reviewed-by' also includes 'acked-by'.
>
> If the SoC maintainers are too stressed to answer in reasonable time
> or I just get randomly bored of waiting yes, I usually apply it anyway.
>
> Just want to give them a heads-up essentially.

My Reviewed-by is also acked-by, so please go ahead and take this
patch through pinctrl tree.

Best regards,
Krzysztof