[PATCH v3 11/13] pinctrl: samsung: Move retention control from mach-exynos to the pinctrl driver

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:46:25 AM CET Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski at samsung.com> wrote:
> > On 2017-01-26 10:10, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Marek Szyprowski
> >> <m.szyprowski at samsung.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This patch moves pad retention control from PMU driver to Exynos pin
> >>> controller driver. This helps to avoid possible ordering and logical
> >>> dependencies between machine, PMU and pin control code. Till now it
> >>> worked fine only because sys_ops for PMU and pin controller were called
> >>> in registration order.
> >>> This is also a preparation for adding new features to Exynos pin
> >>> controller driver, like runtime power management and suspending
> >>> individual pin controllers, which might be a part of some power domain.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> >>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c           |  64 --------------
> >>>   drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 145
> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>
> >> This makes all kind of sense, but I would ideally like an ACK
> >> from the ARM SoC maintainer(s): Arnd, Olof, are you OK with
> >> this?

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>

> > Isn't enough to have Krzysztof's (Exynos SoC maintainer) 'reviewed-by' tag?
> > I assume that 'reviewed-by' also includes 'acked-by'.
> 
> If the SoC maintainers are too stressed to answer in reasonable time
> or I just get randomly bored of waiting yes, I usually apply it anyway.
> 
> Just want to give them a heads-up essentially.

Agreed, that is a reasonable strategy.

	Arnd