[PATCH v3 06/24] ARM: dts: imx6-sabrelite: add OV5642 and OV5640 camera sensors
Philipp Zabel
p.zabel at pengutronix.de
Mon Jan 16 04:55:23 PST 2017
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 15:04 -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>
> On 01/13/2017 04:03 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 06.01.2017, 18:11 -0800 schrieb Steve Longerbeam:
> >> Enables the OV5642 parallel-bus sensor, and the OV5640 MIPI CSI-2 sensor.
> >> Both hang off the same i2c2 bus, so they require different (and non-
> >> default) i2c slave addresses.
> >>
> >> The OV5642 connects to the parallel-bus mux input port on ipu1_csi0_mux.
> >>
> >> The OV5640 connects to the input port on the MIPI CSI-2 receiver on
> >> mipi_csi. It is set to transmit over MIPI virtual channel 1.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam at mentor.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts | 5 ++
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts | 6 ++
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-sabrelite.dtsi | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 129 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts
> >> index 0f06ca5..fec2524 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-sabrelite.dts
[...]
> >> @@ -299,6 +326,52 @@
> >> pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c2>;
> >> status = "okay";
> >> +
> >> + ov5640: camera at 40 {
> >> + compatible = "ovti,ov5640";
> >> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ov5640>;
> >> + clocks = <&mipi_xclk>;
> >> + clock-names = "xclk";
> >> + reg = <0x40>;
> >> + xclk = <22000000>;
> > This is superfluous, you can use clk_get_rate on mipi_xclk.
>
> This property is actually there to tell the driver what to set the
> rate to, with clk_set_rate(). So you are saying it would be better
> to set the rate in the device tree and the driver should only
> retrieve the rate?
Yes. Given that this is a reference clock input that is constant on a
given board and never changes during runtime, I think this is the
correct way. The clock will be fixed rate on most boards, I assume.
regards
Philipp
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list