[RFC PATCH v6 0/7] ARM: Fix dma_alloc_coherent() and friends for NOMMU

Alexandre Torgue alexandre.torgue at st.com
Fri Feb 24 05:46:27 PST 2017


Hi Vlad,

On 01/26/2017 05:42 PM, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seem that addition of cache support for M-class CPUs uncovered
> latent bug in DMA usage. NOMMU memory model has been treated as being
> always consistent; however, for R/M CPU classes memory can be covered
> by MPU which in turn might configure RAM as Normal i.e. bufferable and
> cacheable. It breaks dma_alloc_coherent() and friends, since data can
> stuck in caches now or be buffered.
>
> This patch set is trying to address the issue by providing region of
> memory suitable for consistent DMA operations. It is supposed that
> such region is marked by MPU as non-cacheable. Robin suggested to
> advertise such memory as reserved shared-dma-pool, rather then using
> homebrew command line option, and extend dma-coherent to provide
> default DMA area in the similar way as it is done for CMA (PATCH
> 4/7). It allows us to offload all bookkeeping on generic coherent DMA
> framework, and it seems that it might be reused by other architectures
> like c6x and blackfin.
>
> While reviewing/testing previous vesrions of the patch set it turned
> out that dma-coherent does not take into account "dma-ranges" device
> tree property, so it is addressed in PATCH 3/7.

What it is the status of this RFC ? This patchset is very interesting 
for STM32 platform based on cortex M7 (STM32F746 and STM32H743). Without 
it, we can't activate DMA + CACHE.

Thanks in advance
Alex

>
> For ARM, dedicated DMA region is required for cases other than:
>  - MMU/MPU is off
>  - cpu is v7m w/o cache support
>  - device is coherent
>
> In case one of the above conditions is true dma operations are forced
> to be coherent and wired with dma_noop_ops.
>
> To make life easier NOMMU dma operations are kept in separate
> compilation unit.
>
> Since the issue was reported in the same time as Benjamin sent his
> patch [1] to allow mmap for NOMMU, his case is also addressed in this
> series (PATCH 1/7 and PATCH 2/7).
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1] http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8633/1
>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86 at mina86.com>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern at rowland.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato at users.sourceforge.jp>
> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias at libc.org>
> Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
>
> Vladimir Murzin (7):
>   dma: Take into account dma_pfn_offset
>   dma: Add simple dma_noop_mmap
>   drivers: dma-coherent: Account dma_pfn_offset when used with device
>     tree
>   drivers: dma-coherent: Introduce default DMA pool
>   ARM: NOMMU: Introduce dma operations for noMMU
>   ARM: NOMMU: Set ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE for M-class cpus
>   ARM: dma-mapping: Remove traces of NOMMU code
>
>  .../bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt   |   3 +
>  arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h                 |   3 +-
>  arch/arm/mm/Kconfig                                |   2 +-
>  arch/arm/mm/Makefile                               |   5 +-
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c                    | 253 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c                          |  26 +--
>  drivers/base/dma-coherent.c                        |  76 ++++++-
>  lib/dma-noop.c                                     |  29 ++-
>  8 files changed, 356 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list