[PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the atmel_nand driver
Håvard Skinnemoen
hskinnemoen at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 21:18:13 PST 2017
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >> Come on, v4.10 has just been release and
>>
>> It doesn't build anymore. And current case even worse
>> Face it. It's dead.
>>
>
> I agree it hasn't seen any significant development in a while but I'm
> not the on able to take that decision.
I've been wanting to add devicetree support for some time, but I no
longer remember how to build the toolchain, and I don't have fond
memories of that whole process. And the fact that
4.2.4-atmel.1.1.3.avr32linux.1 is still the most current version of
gcc doesn't make me very optimistic.
So while Hans-Christian and others have been doing a great job of
keeping AVR32 on life support, I tend to think that if there's not
enough enthusiasm for the architecture to build a modern toolchain or
add support for device tree, avr32-linux probably isn't going anywhere
exciting.
> A few weeks ago, I was telling Boris to let it not build for a while and
> then remove it. You already went out of your way to make it work. Again,
> feel free to send a patch removing avr32. I can only see a lot of
> benefits for the Atmel ARM SoCs and the many cleanups that will follow.
Agree, I can't help but feel that the AVR32 support is doing more harm
than good at this point.
> If nobody complains about the 4.10 breakage, You'll have plenty of time
> to remove it for 4.12
I'm fine with that, but I haven't put much effort into keeping it
alive lately. If Hans-Christian agrees, I'm willing to post a patch to
remove it, or ack someone else's patch.
Håvard
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list