[RFC/PATCH] of: Mark property::value as const
Frank Rowand
frowand.list at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 13:47:07 PST 2017
On 02/23/17 11:54, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 02/13/17 18:50, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The 'blob' we pass into populate_properties() is marked as const,
>> but we cast that const away when we assign the result of
>> fdt_getprop_by_offset() to pp->value. Let's mark value as const
>> instead, so that code can't mistakenly write to the value of the
>> property that we've so far advertised as const.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this exposes a problem with the fdt resolver code,
>> where we overwrite the value member of properties of phandles to
>> update them with their final value. Add a comment for now to
>> indicate where we're potentially writing over const data.
>
> The resolver should not be over writing anything in the FDT. I'll
> look at what is going on there.
OK, now that I have looked at the resolver, I see that you meant that
the resolver code is modifying the _overlay_ FDT, not the FDT that
was used at initial boot. So not what I thought you meant.
I'll reply separately to the original patch email with a more complete
response.
-Frank
>
> The FDT we expose to user space should be the FDT we booted with,
> not something later modified.
>
> -Frank
>
>>
>> You can see the problem here by loading an overlay dtb into
>> the kernel via the request firmware helper method (not direct
>> loading) and then passing that tree to the resolver on an arm64
>> device. In this case, the firmware data is vmapped with KERNEL_PAGE_RO
>> and the code crashes when attempting to write to the blob to update
>> the phandle properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>
>> I was thinking perhaps it would work to store another __be32 variant
>> of the phandle in each device node, but then we still have a problem
>> with properties that have phandles inside them at some offset that we
>> need to update. I guess the only real solution is to deep copy the
>> property in that case and then save around some info to free the
>> duplicated property later on?
>>
>> drivers/of/base.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/of/fdt.c | 12 ++++++------
>> drivers/of/resolver.c | 3 +++
>> include/linux/of.h | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> < snip >
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list