[RESEND PATCH v7 0/7] Rockchip dw-mipi-dsi driver
Sean Paul
seanpaul at chromium.org
Wed Feb 22 14:10:12 PST 2017
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:55 PM, John Keeping <john at metanate.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:57:05 -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, John Keeping <john at metanate.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:39:18 -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:02:16PM +0800, Chris Zhong wrote:
>> >> > Hi all
>> >> >
>> >> > [Resend this v7 version series, since there are 5 mails have gone missing, last
>> >> > week]
>> >> >
>> >> > This version does not change the existing v6 patches, just to add the
>> >> > "bandwidth fix" patch back, since we really need it.
>> >> >
>> >> > This patch serial is for RK3399 MIPI DSI. The MIPI DSI controller of
>> >> > RK3399 is almost the same as RK3288, except a little bit of difference
>> >> > in phy clock controlling and port id selection register. These patches
>> >> > add RK3399 support and the power domain support.
>> >> >
>> >> > And these patches base on John Keeping's v3 patches[0], it fixes many bugs,
>> >> > they have been tested on rk3288 evb board.
>> >>
>> >> Do we have an ETA on when John is planning on respinning his patchset based on
>> >> review feedback?
>> >
>> > I have all of the changes queued but I was hoping to find some time to
>> > test the latest version before sending it out; unfortunately everything
>> > else is more important at the moment. If you're happy with the caveat
>> > that the latest changes are build tested only I can probably send it
>> > out this afternoon.
>>
>> I suppose my answer depends on when the tested version will be
>> available, or perhaps Chris can test the new set for you? I don't have
>> any rockchip devices with mipi, so i'm not much help.
>
> None of the changes scare me that much, so I don't expect testing to
> throw up any problems but I don't like throwing out patches without at
> least a basic test run.
>
Agreed. I don't think we're in such desperate need that we should
forego testing. If Chris can provide Tested-by, you should send them
out, otherwise I'm happy to wait.
Thanks for the update,
Sean
> I might have time to test on Friday, but I expect Chris has more time to
> devote to this than I do, so maybe it's better if I send the patches out
> tomorrow.
>
>
> John
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list