[PATCH 2/2] media: dt-bindings: vpif: extend the example with an output port

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

2017-02-21 15:57 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski
> <bgolaszewski at baylibre.com> wrote:
>> This makes the example more or less correspond with the da850-evm
>> hardware setup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski at baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt    | 36 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
>> index 9c7510b..d6f93a1 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Required properties:
>>  Video Capture:
>>
>>  VPIF has a 16-bit parallel bus input, supporting 2 8-bit channels or a
>> -single 16-bit channel.  It should contain at least one port child node
>> +single 16-bit channel. It should contain one or two port child nodes
>
> When do you not have an output? Seems kind of useless. I'm guessing
> this is an oversight in the binding and there should always be port 1
> and a connector node, so document it that way.
>

Sometimes the output pins are not hooked up to anything - for example
on the da850-lcdk board we only use input for camera capture, while on
da850-evm we have both composite and s-video outputs and inputs. I
think it makes sens to leave out the output port if we don't use it.

> This also needs to state what port 0 and port 1 are (i.e. input or
> output and type of data).
>

I'll fix that.

>>  with child 'endpoint' node. Please refer to the bindings defined in
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt.
>>
>> @@ -28,19 +28,26 @@ I2C-connected TVP5147 decoder:
>>                 reg = <0x217000 0x1000>;
>>                 interrupts = <92>;
>>
>> -               port {
>> -                       vpif_ch0: endpoint at 0 {
>> +               port at 0 {
>> +                       vpif_input_ch0: endpoint at 0 {
>>                                 reg = <0>;
>>                                 bus-width = <8>;
>> -                               remote-endpoint = <&composite>;
>> +                               remote-endpoint = <&composite_in>;
>>                         };
>>
>> -                       vpif_ch1: endpoint at 1 {
>> +                       vpif_input_ch1: endpoint at 1 {
>>                                 reg = <1>;
>>                                 bus-width = <8>;
>>                                 data-shift = <8>;
>>                         };
>>                 };
>> +
>> +               port at 1 {
>> +                       vpif_output_ch0: endpoint {
>> +                               bus-width = <8>;
>
> Isn't this an analog input? bus-width doesn't make sense for that.
>

Not yet - the signals first go to a video DAC (adv7343 in the example).

Thanks,
Bartosz