[RFC PATCH v1] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Check for leaf entry right after finding it
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
olekstysh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 21 05:31:26 PST 2017
Hi, Robin.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote:
> On 16/02/17 13:52, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko at epam.com>
>>
>> Do a check for already installed leaf entry at the current level before
>> performing any actions when trying to map.
>>
>> This check is already present in arm_v7s_init_pte(), i.e. before
>> installing new leaf entry at the current level if conditions to do so
>> are met (num_entries > 0).
>>
>> But, this might be insufficient in case when we have already
>> installed block mapping at this level and it is not time to
>> install new leaf entry (num_entries == 0).
>> In that case we continue walking the page table down with wrong pointer
>> to the next level.
>>
>> So, move check from arm_v7s_init_pte() to __arm_v7s_map() in order to
>> avoid all cases.
>
> Would it not be more logical (and simpler) to just check that the thing
> we dereference is valid to dereference when we dereference it? i.e.:
>
> -----8<-----
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
> b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
> index 0769276c0537..f3112f9ff494 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
> @@ -418,8 +418,10 @@ static int __arm_v7s_map(struct arm_v7s_io_pgtable
> *data, unsigned long iova,
> pte |= ARM_V7S_ATTR_NS_TABLE;
>
> __arm_v7s_set_pte(ptep, pte, 1, cfg);
> - } else {
> + } else if (ARM_V7S_PTE_IS_TABLE(pte, lvl)) {
> cptep = iopte_deref(pte, lvl);
> + } else {
> + return -EEXIST;
> }
>
> /* Rinse, repeat */
> ----->8-----
Agree. Sounds reasonable.
>
> I think the equivalent could be done in LPAE as well.
OK.
I will resend both modified patches without RFC prefix, right?
>
> Robin.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko at epam.com>
>> ---
>> This patch does similar things as the patch I have pushed a week ago
>> for long-descriptor format [1].
>> The reason why this patch is RFC is because I am not sure I did the right
>> thing and I even didn't test it.
>>
>> [1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2017-February/020411.html
>> ---
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
>> index f50e51c..7f7594b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
>> @@ -364,10 +364,6 @@ static int arm_v7s_init_pte(struct arm_v7s_io_pgtable *data,
>> if (WARN_ON(__arm_v7s_unmap(data, iova + i * sz,
>> sz, lvl, tblp) != sz))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> - } else if (ptep[i]) {
>> - /* We require an unmap first */
>> - WARN_ON(!selftest_running);
>> - return -EEXIST;
>> }
>>
>> pte |= ARM_V7S_PTE_TYPE_PAGE;
>> @@ -392,11 +388,20 @@ static int __arm_v7s_map(struct arm_v7s_io_pgtable *data, unsigned long iova,
>> {
>> struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg = &data->iop.cfg;
>> arm_v7s_iopte pte, *cptep;
>> - int num_entries = size >> ARM_V7S_LVL_SHIFT(lvl);
>> + int i = 0, num_entries = size >> ARM_V7S_LVL_SHIFT(lvl);
>>
>> /* Find our entry at the current level */
>> ptep += ARM_V7S_LVL_IDX(iova, lvl);
>>
>> + /* Check for already installed leaf entry */
>> + do {
>> + if (ptep[i] && !ARM_V7S_PTE_IS_TABLE(ptep[i], lvl)) {
>> + /* We require an unmap first */
>> + WARN_ON(!selftest_running);
>> + return -EEXIST;
>> + }
>> + } while (++i < num_entries);
>> +
>> /* If we can install a leaf entry at this level, then do so */
>> if (num_entries)
>> return arm_v7s_init_pte(data, iova, paddr, prot,
>>
>
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list