[PATCH v2] arm64: print a fault message when attempting to write RO memory
Stephen Boyd
stephen.boyd at linaro.org
Thu Feb 16 17:19:59 PST 2017
If a page is marked read only we should print out that fact,
instead of printing out that there was a page fault. Right now we
get a cryptic error message that something went wrong with an
unhandled fault, but we don't evaluate the esr to figure out that
it was a read/write permission fault.
Instead of seeing:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff000008e460d8
pgd = ffff800003504000
[ffff000008e460d8] *pgd=0000000083473003, *pud=0000000083503003, *pmd=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP
we'll see:
Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory at virtual address ffff000008e760d8
pgd = ffff80003d3de000
[ffff000008e760d8] *pgd=0000000083472003, *pud=0000000083435003, *pmd=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Cc: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd at linaro.org>
---
Changes from v1:
* Move into __do_kernel_fault() (Mark Rutland)
arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 156169c6981b..8bd4e7f11c70 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -160,12 +160,28 @@ static bool is_el1_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr)
return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR;
}
+static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
+ unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE;
+
+ if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR)
+ return false;
+
+ if (system_uses_ttbr0_pan())
+ return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT &&
+ (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT);
+ else
+ return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM;
+}
+
/*
* The kernel tried to access some page that wasn't present.
*/
static void __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ const char *msg;
/*
* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault?
* We are almost certainly not prepared to handle instruction faults.
@@ -177,9 +193,19 @@ static void __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
* No handler, we'll have to terminate things with extreme prejudice.
*/
bust_spinlocks(1);
- pr_alert("Unable to handle kernel %s at virtual address %08lx\n",
- (addr < PAGE_SIZE) ? "NULL pointer dereference" :
- "paging request", addr);
+
+ if (is_permission_fault(esr, regs)) {
+ if (esr & ESR_ELx_WNR)
+ msg = "write to read-only memory";
+ else
+ msg = "read from unreadable memory";
+ } else if (addr < PAGE_SIZE)
+ msg = "NULL pointer dereference";
+ else
+ msg = "paging request";
+
+ pr_alert("Unable to handle kernel %s at virtual address %08lx\n", msg,
+ addr);
show_pte(mm, addr);
die("Oops", regs, esr);
@@ -269,21 +295,6 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
return fault;
}
-static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
- unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE;
-
- if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR)
- return false;
-
- if (system_uses_ttbr0_pan())
- return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT &&
- (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT);
- else
- return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM;
-}
-
static bool is_el0_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr)
{
return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW;
--
2.10.0.297.gf6727b0
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list