[RFC PATCH 07/33] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Macro-ize its_send_single_command
Auger Eric
eric.auger at redhat.com
Thu Feb 16 06:59:23 PST 2017
Hi,
On 17/01/2017 11:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Most ITS commands do operate on a collection object, and require
> a SYNC command to be performed on that collection in order to
> guarantee the execution of the first command.
>
> With GICv4 ITS, another set of commands perform similar operations
> on a VPE object, and a VSYNC operations must be executed to guarantee
> their execution.
>
> Given the similarities (post a command, perform a synchronization
> operation on a sync object), it makes sense to reuse the same
> mechanism for both class of commands.
>
> Let's start with turning its_send_single_command into a huge macro
> that performs the bulk of the work, and a set of helpers that
> make this macro useeable for the GICv3 ITS commands.
s/useeable/usable
Eric
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index 99f6130..520b764 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -484,43 +484,51 @@ static void its_wait_for_range_completion(struct its_node *its,
> }
> }
>
> -static void its_send_single_command(struct its_node *its,
> - its_cmd_builder_t builder,
> - struct its_cmd_desc *desc)
> -{
> - struct its_cmd_block *cmd, *sync_cmd, *next_cmd;
> - struct its_collection *sync_col;
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&its->lock, flags);
> -
> - cmd = its_allocate_entry(its);
> - if (!cmd) { /* We're soooooo screewed... */
> - pr_err_ratelimited("ITS can't allocate, dropping command\n");
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&its->lock, flags);
> - return;
> - }
> - sync_col = builder(cmd, desc);
> - its_flush_cmd(its, cmd);
> -
> - if (sync_col) {
> - sync_cmd = its_allocate_entry(its);
> - if (!sync_cmd) {
> - pr_err_ratelimited("ITS can't SYNC, skipping\n");
> - goto post;
> - }
> - its_encode_cmd(sync_cmd, GITS_CMD_SYNC);
> - its_encode_target(sync_cmd, sync_col->target_address);
> - its_fixup_cmd(sync_cmd);
> - its_flush_cmd(its, sync_cmd);
> - }
> -
> -post:
> - next_cmd = its_post_commands(its);
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&its->lock, flags);
> -
> - its_wait_for_range_completion(its, cmd, next_cmd);
> -}
> +#define __its_send_single_cmd(name, buildtype, synctype, buildfn) \
> +void name(struct its_node *its, \
> + buildtype builder, \
> + struct its_cmd_desc *desc) \
> +{ \
> + struct its_cmd_block *cmd, *sync_cmd, *next_cmd; \
> + synctype *sync_obj; \
> + unsigned long flags; \
> + \
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&its->lock, flags); \
> + \
> + cmd = its_allocate_entry(its); \
> + if (!cmd) { /* We're soooooo screewed... */ \
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&its->lock, flags); \
> + return; \
> + } \
> + sync_obj = builder(cmd, desc); \
> + its_flush_cmd(its, cmd); \
> + \
> + if (sync_obj) { \
> + sync_cmd = its_allocate_entry(its); \
> + if (!sync_cmd) \
> + goto post; \
> + \
> + buildfn(sync_cmd, sync_obj); \
> + its_fixup_cmd(sync_cmd); \
> + its_flush_cmd(its, sync_cmd); \
> + } \
> + \
> +post: \
> + next_cmd = its_post_commands(its); \
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&its->lock, flags); \
> + \
> + its_wait_for_range_completion(its, cmd, next_cmd); \
> +}
> +
> +static void its_build_sync_cmd(struct its_cmd_block *sync_cmd,
> + struct its_collection *sync_col)
> +{
> + its_encode_cmd(sync_cmd, GITS_CMD_SYNC);
> + its_encode_target(sync_cmd, sync_col->target_address);
> +}
> +
> +static __its_send_single_cmd(its_send_single_command, its_cmd_builder_t,
> + struct its_collection, its_build_sync_cmd)
>
> static void its_send_inv(struct its_device *dev, u32 event_id)
> {
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list