[PATCH v6 5/5] ARM: dts: sun9i: Initial support for the Sunchip CX-A99 board
Chen-Yu Tsai
wens at csie.org
Wed Feb 15 22:31:16 PST 2017
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
<rask at formelder.dk> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:59:20AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:34:06AM +0100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
>> > The Suncip CX-A99 board is found in at least four brands of media players.
>> > It features an Allwinner A80 ARM SoC and is found in two models:
>> >
>> > 1) 2 GiB DDR3 DRAM and 16 GB eMMC
>> > 2) 4 GiB DDR3 DRAM and 32 GB eMMC
>> >
>> > For details of the board, see the linux-sunxi page
>> > <URL:https://linux-sunxi.org/Sunchip_CX-A99>.
>>
>> Please don't put URLs in commit logs (and the DT).
>
> OK.
>
>> > Supported features (+ means tested):
>> > + One Cortex-A7 CPU core (or four with experimental U-Boot PSCI patches)
>> > + AXP808 power management chip
>> > + OZ80120 voltage regulator
>> > + Serial console port (internal)
>> > + eMMC and SD card slot
>> > + USB 2.0 host ports on on-board USB hub
>> > + SATA port on on-board SATA-to-USB bridge *
>> > + IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac SDIO Wifi
>> > + Real-time clock
>> > + LEDs
>> > - IR receiver for remote control
>> >
>> > * Only shows up when a SATA device is connected. Also, if a power source
>> > is connected to the USB 3.0 connector across power cycles (e.g. FEL
>> > boot), the bridge may not properly reset and not show up on the USB bus.
>> > The vendor U-Boot performs some unknown magic which resets the bridge.
>>
>> Is that magic at the USB level, or specific to the bridge itself?
>
> I don't know, but since the other USB port connected to the hub comes up
> fine, I'm assuming it's something to do with the SATA-to-USB bridge.
>
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80-cx-a99.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80-cx-a99.dts
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..f5496d2
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80-cx-a99.dts
> [...]
>> > + /* USB 3.0 standard-A receptacle. For now, only Vbus is supported. */
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "only VBUS is supported"? Is there any
>> other signal?
>
> I'm just trying to say that at the moment, all the connector will do is to
> supply power to a connected device (for charging batteries or whatever).
>
>> > + reg_usb0_vbus: regulator-usb0-vbus {
>> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > + regulator-name = "usb0-vbus";
>> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > + gpio = <&pio 7 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PH15 */
>> > + enable-active-high;
>>
>> This is redundant with the GPIO flag
>
> No. I have now tested without "enable-active-high" and then Vbus stays off.
> This is also in line with the binding documentation:
>
> "- enable-active-high: Polarity of GPIO is Active high
> If this property is missing, the default assumed is Active low."
>
> It also seems to me that the way this is implemented in Linux, the GPIO
> polarity flag is ignored.
>
>> > + regulator-always-on;
>>
>> And it shouldn't be always on. The USB driver will enable it if needs
>> be.
>
> Yes, we just don't have a driver for the A80 USB 3.0 port yet.
>
>> > + /*
>> > + * A GL850G hub with two external USB connectors is connected
>> > + * to ehci0. Each has a Vbus regulator controlled by a GPIO:
>> > + * PL7 for port 1, closest to the 12 V power connector, and
>> > + * PL8 for port 2, next to the SD card slot.
>> > + * Because regulator-fixed doesn't support a GPIO list, and
>> > + * allwinner,sun9i-a80-usb-phy doesn't support more than one
>> > + * supply, we have to use regulator-always-on on usb1-2-vbus.
>> > + * Note that the GPIO pins also need cldo1 to be enabled.
>> > + */
>>
>> What is the source of those regulators connected then? Some PMIC
>> regulator? AC-IN?
>
> These two regulators are supplied from a fixed 12 V to 5 V DC-DC converter
> which can't be controlled in any way.
>
>> > + reg_usb1_1_vbus: regulator-usb1-1-vbus {
>> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > + regulator-name = "usb1-1-vbus";
>> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > + gpio = <&r_pio 0 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PL7 */
>> > + enable-active-high;
>> > + };
>> > +
>> > + reg_usb1_2_vbus: regulator-usb1-2-vbus {
>> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > + regulator-name = "usb1-2-vbus";
>> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > + gpio = <&r_pio 0 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PL8 */
>> > + enable-active-high;
>> > + regulator-always-on;
>>
>> Same comment about always on. If the driver needs fixing to grab an
>> additional regulator, fix it, but this shouldn't be left that way.
>
> I agree, but a lot of work is missing to get to that point. To get the USB
> ports up and running, you need to enable quite a few regulators:
> 1. VDD09-USB for the controller internals.
> 2. VCC33-USB for the PHY.
> 3. Vbus for each connector belonging to the controller.
> 4. Pin group supply for the GPIO pins controlling each of the Vbus supplies.
>
> Nobody seems to have thought about the first and the last two supplies when
> the bindings were written. In this case, 1, 2 and 4 will be connected to
> always-on regulators anyway. Getting support for multiple Vbus supplies
> probably needs something along the lines of what was discussed with your
> coupled regulator patches:
>
> https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/398862.html
> https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/405401.html
> https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/466207.html
>
>> > + /* OZ80120 voltage regulator for the four Cortex-A15 cores. */
>> > + reg_vdd_cpub: regulator-vdd-cpub {
>> > + compatible = "regulator-gpio";
>> > +
>> > + regulator-always-on;
>> > + regulator-min-microvolt = < 800000>;
>> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
>> > + regulator-name = "vdd-cpub";
>> > +
>> > + enable-gpio = <&r_pio 0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PL2 */
>> > + enable-active-high;
>> > + gpios = <&r_pio 0 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>, /* PL3 */
>> > + <&r_pio 0 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>, /* PL4 */
>> > + <&r_pio 0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PL5 */
>> > +
>> > + gpios-states = <1 0 0>;
>> > + states = < 750000 0x7
>> > + 800000 0x3
>> > + 850000 0x5
>> > + 900000 0x1
>> > + 950000 0x6
>> > + 1000000 0x2
>> > + 1100000 0x4
>> > + 1200000 0x0>;
>>
>> You're listing a minimum state of 750mv, yet your minimum voltage is
>> 800mV.
>
> Yes. The regulator is capable of outputting the listed voltages in the
> 750 mV to 1200 mV range, but the permissible range of the consumer is only
> 800 mV to 1100 mV according to the A80 data sheet. Likewise, the AXP806
> regulators support a larger voltage range than that of the connected
> consumers.
>
>> > +/* Ampak AP6335 IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac "Wifi". */
>>
>> Why "wifi" ? It's not implementing true wifi?
>
> I put quotes around it because the proper spelling is Wi-Fi, but since that
> is a trademark, most people use the term Wifi capitalised in one way or
> another (or sometimes not). Grepping the other dts files, it seems customary
> to leave out the quotes, so I'll do the same.
>
>> > +&mmc1 {
>> > + bus-width = <4>;
>> > + non-removable;
>> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> > + pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>;
>> > + vmmc-supply = <®_cldo3>; /* See cldo2,cldo3 note. */
>> > + vqmmc-supply = <®_aldo2>;
>>
>> So it's able to support 1.2 or 1.8V IO modes? Surely you want to
>> enable those modes here to.
>
> Thanks for the hint. I thought the driver would automatically detect that.
> The following modes are supported according to the data sheet:
>
> * DS: Default speed up to 25MHz (3.3V signaling).
> * HS: High speed up to 50MHz (3.3V signaling).
> * SDR12: SDR up to 25MHz (1.8V signaling).
> * SDR25: SDR up to 50MHz (1.8V signaling).
> * SDR50: SDR up to 100MHz (1.8V signaling).
> * SDR104: SDR up to 208MHz (1.8V signaling).
> * DDR50: DDR up to 50MHz (1.8V signaling).
>
> Unfortunately, when I enable the 1.8 V modes, or even just SDR-12, the
> device fails to initialise with error -110 (-ETIMEDOUT). I will take a look
> at that, but no promises.
The kernel doesn't support lower I/O voltages for the A80 at the moment.
The pin controller has voltage level controls that need to match the
external regulators supplying it power.
Rockchip has a similar thing called "Rockchip IO Domain". Look for the
ROCKCHIP_IODOMAIN Kconfig symbol. My plan is to do something similar,
as a subdevice to the pin controller.
We cannot have it as part of the pin controller as that leads to a
circular dependency for the R_PIO, thus blocking device probing for
the rest of the system.
However this is somewhat low on my todo list as it works fine without.
Regards
ChenYu
>
>> > + pmic at 745 {
>> > + compatible = "x-powers,axp808", "x-powers,axp806";
>> > + reg = <0x745>;
>> > + interrupt-parent = <&nmi_intc>;
>> > + interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>> > + interrupt-controller;
>> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> > +
>> > + swin-supply = <®_dcdce>;
>>
>> Please use an incude for that PMIC.
>
> I don't understand. What would that include file contain? Very few lines
> would be shared between .dts files. You could save < 8 lines total if you
> #include the 5 lines that are common between the Cubieboard4, the Optimus
> and this board.
>
>> > + /* In comments: Initial setup from vendor sys_config.fex. */
>> > + regulators {
>> > + /* 3.0 V (enabled). */
>>
>> This might be disabled though.
>
> Indeed it is currently disabled by the kernel during startup, as there are
> no consumers listed in the device tree. I don't know what that regulator
> supplies, and it is on my to-do list for probing the next time that I have
> the heat sink off the board.
>
>> > + /* 1.8 V (enabled). */
>> > + reg_aldo2: aldo2 {
>> > + regulator-boot-on;
>> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
>> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3600000>;
>> > + regulator-name = "vcc-pg-pm-wifi+btio-audio";
>>
>> Usually, there is simpler names available on the schematics, or at
>> least simpler names we can come up with.
>
> I don't have schematics as it's not a developer board. V1.1 of the PCB,
> which I have, doesn't even have the component names silkscreened onto it.
>
> --
> Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list