[PATCH v6 2/4] Documentation: dt: add bindings for ti-cpufreq

Dave Gerlach d-gerlach at ti.com
Fri Feb 10 12:55:29 PST 2017


On 02/10/2017 06:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 10, 2017 08:43:49 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 09-02-17, 23:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> In particular, Viresh, if you ACK something, please make sure that it
>>> doesn't conflict with your own patches.
>>
>> I hope you are talking about the patch 3/4 for which Arnd also sent a
>> fix.  I acked it back on 18th of January and Dave has been carrying my
>> Ack since then. When he posted again, I didn't went into reviewing it
>> again as I saw my Ack being there.
>
> Well, OK, but you did know that the OPP API had changed in the meantime,
> so it wouldn't have hurt to double check I suppose?
>
>> Yes, he ended up using an API which just got updated after 18th of Jan
>> and yes both me and Dave missed that. But I feel it is difficult to
>> take care of scenarios like this. Perhaps he should have made sure
>> that he base it of pm/linux-next and nothing would have gone wrong.
>
> Yes, that would help, but then how to enforce that?

I apologize, I was unaware of the conflicting series. I'm not sure of a good way 
to enforce it but I do agree I will make sure to rebase and test against 
pm/linux-next before sending in the future.

Regards,
Dave

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list