[PATCH net-next 6/8] net: ethernet: annapurna: add wol helpers to the Alpine driver
David Laight
David.Laight at ACULAB.COM
Mon Feb 6 03:35:49 PST 2017
From: netdev-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sergei Shtylyov
> Sent: 03 February 2017 18:22
> On 02/03/2017 09:12 PM, Antoine Tenart wrote:
>
> > Implement the get_wol() and set_wol() helpers in the Annapurna Labs
> > Alpine Ethernet driver.
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/annapurna/al_eth.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/annapurna/al_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/annapurna/al_eth.c
> > index 8dd84f66b5d1..d06a75a49ce5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/annapurna/al_eth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/annapurna/al_eth.c
> > @@ -2519,10 +2519,54 @@ static u32 al_eth_get_rxfh_indir_size(struct net_device *netdev)
> > return AL_ETH_RX_RSS_TABLE_SIZE;
> > }
> >
> > +static void al_eth_get_wol(struct net_device *netdev,
> > + struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> > +{
> > + struct al_eth_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > + struct phy_device *phydev;
> > +
> > + wol->wolopts = adapter->wol;
> > +
> > + if ((adapter) && (adapter->phy_exist) && (adapter->mdio_bus)) {
>
> Now that's somewhat stupid looking... does the whole driver use this "style"?
Not only that, in one of the two functions it is followed by:
+ device_set_wakeup_enable(&adapter->pdev->dev, adapter->wol);
Which assumes that 'adapter' is not NULL.
Some verifiers will detect that as a possible NULL pointer dereference.
Pointers should only be checked for NULL if there are valid reasons
why they can be NULL in that code path.
Getting there with a NULL pointer dues to some race condition isn't one of them.
David
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list