[PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: dt: add bindings for ti-cpufreq
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Wed Sep 7 20:35:57 PDT 2016
On 07-09-16, 09:36, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 09/07/2016 12:12 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >On 31-08-16, 21:53, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> >>+In 'operating-points-v2' table:
> >>+- compatible: Should be
> >>+ - 'operating-points-v2-ti-am3352-cpu' for am335x SoCs
> >>+ - 'operating-points-v2-ti-am4372-cpu' for am43xx SoCs
> >>+ - 'operating-points-v2-ti-dra7-cpu' for dra7xx/am57xx SoCs
> >
> >Why do you need SoC specific compatible here? Are you defining new
> >fields in OPP tables for your SoC ? How are the tables for your case
> >going to differ from the ones using "operating-points-v2" compatible
> >string?
> >
>
> I thought you had suggested that I do this in your comments from v1, but I
> guess that was dependent on whether or not I put the properties I have
> inserted into the cpu node into the operating-points table instead.
Yes.
> I still
> have gotten no comments from any DT maintainers so I left it as is. I am
> still not sure if that is acceptable.
@Rob: Can you please share your views on the new properties being
added to the CPU node ?
--
viresh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list