[PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6sx: Fix LCDIF interrupt type

[Fabio Estevam]

Hi Marek,

On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> The LCDIF interrupt should be triggered by the rising edge of the
> IRQ line because we only want the interrupt to trigger once per each
> frame. It seems the LCDIF IRQ line cannot be explicitly de-asserted
> by software, so the previous behavior before this patch, where the
> interrupt was triggered by level-high status of the IRQ line, caused
> the interrupt to fire again immediatelly after it was handled, which
> caused the system to lock up due to the high rate of interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at nxp.com>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
> index 1a473e8..9526c38 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi
> @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@
>                                 lcdif1: lcdif at 02220000 {
>                                         compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif";
>                                         reg = <0x02220000 0x4000>;
> -                                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;

What about mx6ul and mx6sl.dtsi? Shouldn't they be also updated?