[RESPIN-PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove static mapping of SCU SFR
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Tue Nov 8 11:04:46 PST 2016
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:43PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Lets remove static mapping of SCU SFR mainly used in CORTEX-A9 SoC based boards.
> Instead use mapping from device tree node of SCU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar at samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 22 ------------------
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 2 --
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 5 ++--
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 13 ++++-------
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h | 4 ----
> 7 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
> index 9424a8a..dd5d8e8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ extern void exynos_cpu_restore_register(void);
> extern void exynos_pm_central_suspend(void);
> extern int exynos_pm_central_resume(void);
> extern void exynos_enter_aftr(void);
> +extern int exynos_scu_enable(void);
>
> extern struct cpuidle_exynos_data cpuidle_coupled_exynos_data;
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 757fc11..fa08ef9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -28,15 +28,6 @@
>
> #include "common.h"
>
> -static struct map_desc exynos4_iodesc[] __initdata = {
> - {
> - .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_COREPERI_BASE,
> - .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS4_PA_COREPERI),
> - .length = SZ_8K,
> - .type = MT_DEVICE,
> - },
> -};
> -
> static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
> .name = "exynos_cpuidle",
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE
> @@ -99,17 +90,6 @@ static int __init exynos_fdt_map_chipid(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> return 1;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * exynos_map_io
> - *
> - * register the standard cpu IO areas
> - */
> -static void __init exynos_map_io(void)
> -{
> - if (soc_is_exynos4())
> - iotable_init(exynos4_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4_iodesc));
> -}
> -
> static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
> {
> debug_ll_io_init();
> @@ -118,8 +98,6 @@ static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>
> /* detect cpu id and rev. */
> s5p_init_cpu(S5P_VA_CHIPID);
> -
> - exynos_map_io();
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
> index 5fb0040..0eef407 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,4 @@
>
> #define EXYNOS_PA_CHIPID 0x10000000
>
> -#define EXYNOS4_PA_COREPERI 0x10500000
> -
> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_MAP_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> index a5d6841..94405c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,27 @@ int exynos_cluster_power_state(int cluster)
> S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * exynos_scu_enable : enables SCU for Cortex-A9 based system
> + * returns 0 on success else non-zero error code
> + */
> +int exynos_scu_enable(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + void __iomem *scu_base;
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-scu");
> + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + of_node_put(np);
> + if (!scu_base) {
> + pr_err("%s failed to map scu_base\n", __func__);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + scu_enable(scu_base);
> + iounmap(scu_base);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void __iomem *cpu_boot_reg_base(void)
> {
> if (soc_is_exynos4210() && samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1)
> @@ -224,11 +245,6 @@ static void write_pen_release(int val)
> sync_cache_w(&pen_release);
> }
>
> -static void __iomem *scu_base_addr(void)
> -{
> - return (void __iomem *)(S5P_VA_SCU);
> -}
> -
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(boot_lock);
>
> static void exynos_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -393,9 +409,11 @@ static void __init exynos_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>
> exynos_set_delayed_reset_assertion(true);
>
> - if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> - scu_enable(scu_base_addr());
> -
> + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
> + /* if exynos_scu_enable fails, return */
> + if (exynos_scu_enable())
> + return;
Ohhh, someone (e.g. out-of-tree DTS) might be surprised with this.
Please mention such change of behaviour in the commit log (describe the
possible impact of this commit).
> + }
> /*
> * Write the address of secondary startup into the
> * system-wide flags register. The boot monitor waits
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> index 487295f..23db2af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
Why do you need this include? Was it coming from mach/map.h?
> #include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h>
> #include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h>
>
> @@ -26,8 +27,6 @@
> #include <asm/suspend.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> -#include <mach/map.h>
> -
> #include "common.h"
>
> static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_addr(void)
> @@ -177,7 +176,7 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void)
> cpu_suspend(0, exynos_aftr_finisher);
>
> if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
> - scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU);
> + exynos_scu_enable();
> if (call_firmware_op(resume) == -ENOSYS)
> exynos_cpu_restore_register();
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> index 06332f6..c73c857 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
> #include <asm/smp_scu.h>
> #include <asm/suspend.h>
>
> -#include <mach/map.h>
> -
> #include <plat/pm-common.h>
>
> #include "common.h"
> @@ -461,12 +459,11 @@ static void exynos_pm_resume(void)
> /* For release retention */
> exynos_pm_release_retention();
>
> - if (cpuid == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> - scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU);
> -
> - if (call_firmware_op(resume) == -ENOSYS
> - && cpuid == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> - exynos_cpu_restore_register();
> + if (cpuid == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
> + exynos_scu_enable();
> + if (call_firmware_op(resume) == -ENOSYS)
> + exynos_cpu_restore_register();
It does not look right. I think you changed the logic here. Previously
if CPU != A9, then call_firmware_op() was executed. Now it won't be.
BTW, don't respin patchset with the same version number. This is
basically v3. To me, increasing version number is always welcomed. It
makes dealign with patches easier.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> + }
>
> early_wakeup:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h
> index 0fe2828..512ed1f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h
> @@ -15,10 +15,6 @@
>
> #define S5P_VA_CHIPID S3C_ADDR(0x02000000)
>
> -#define S5P_VA_COREPERI_BASE S3C_ADDR(0x02800000)
> -#define S5P_VA_COREPERI(x) (S5P_VA_COREPERI_BASE + (x))
> -#define S5P_VA_SCU S5P_VA_COREPERI(0x0)
> -
> #define VA_VIC(x) (S3C_VA_IRQ + ((x) * 0x10000))
> #define VA_VIC0 VA_VIC(0)
> #define VA_VIC1 VA_VIC(1)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list