[PATCH v5 1/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version
Hanjun Guo
hanjun.guo at linaro.org
Thu May 12 18:48:50 PDT 2016
On 2016/4/26 5:21, Al Stone wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
> spec that had not yet been mentioned -- for example, the 6.0 mechanisms
> added to make it easier to define processors and low power idle states,
> as well as the 6.1 addition allowing regular interrupts (not just from
> GPIO) be used to signal ACPI general purpose events.
>
> This patch reflects going back through and examining the specs in detail
> and updating content appropriately. Whilst there, a few odds and ends of
> typos were caught as well. This brings the documentation up to date with
> ACPI 6.1 for arm64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone at linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.txt | 343 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt | 40 ++--
> 2 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.txt b/Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.txt
> index a6e1a18..c77010c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.txt
> @@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ For ACPI on arm64, tables also fall into the following categories:
>
> -- Required: DSDT, FADT, GTDT, MADT, MCFG, RSDP, SPCR, XSDT
>
> - -- Recommended: BERT, EINJ, ERST, HEST, SSDT
> + -- Recommended: BERT, EINJ, ERST, HEST, PCCT, SSDT
>
> - -- Optional: BGRT, CPEP, CSRT, DRTM, ECDT, FACS, FPDT, MCHI, MPST,
> - MSCT, RASF, SBST, SLIT, SPMI, SRAT, TCPA, TPM2, UEFI
> -
> - -- Not supported: BOOT, DBG2, DBGP, DMAR, ETDT, HPET, IBFT, IVRS,
> - LPIT, MSDM, RSDT, SLIC, WAET, WDAT, WDRT, WPBT
> + -- Optional: BGRT, CPEP, CSRT, DBG2, DRTM, ECDT, FACS, FPDT, IORT,
> + MCHI, MPST, MSCT, NFIT, PMTT, RASF, SBST, SLIT, SPMI, SRAT, STAO,
> + TCPA, TPM2, UEFI, XENV
>
> + -- Not supported: BOOT, DBGP, DMAR, ETDT, HPET, IBFT, IVRS, LPIT,
> + MSDM, OEMx, PSDT, RSDT, SLIC, WAET, WDAT, WDRT, WPBT
>
> Table Usage for ARMv8 Linux
> ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ CSRT Signature Reserved (signature == "CSRT")
>
> DBG2 Signature Reserved (signature == "DBG2")
> == DeBuG port table 2 ==
> - Microsoft only table, will not be supported.
> + License has changed and should be usable. Optional if used instead
> + of earlycon=<device> on the command line.
>
> DBGP Signature Reserved (signature == "DBGP")
> == DeBuG Port table ==
> @@ -133,10 +134,11 @@ GTDT Section 5.2.24 (signature == "GTDT")
>
> HEST Section 18.3.2 (signature == "HEST")
> == Hardware Error Source Table ==
> - Until further error source types are defined, use only types 6 (AER
> - Root Port), 7 (AER Endpoint), 8 (AER Bridge), or 9 (Generic Hardware
> - Error Source). Firmware first error handling is possible if and only
> - if Trusted Firmware is being used on arm64.
> + ARM-specific error sources have been defined; please use those or the
> + PCI types such as type 6 (AER Root Port), 7 (AER Endpoint), or 8 (AER
> + Bridge), or use type 9 (Generic Hardware Error Source). Firmware first
> + error handling is possible if and only if Trusted Firmware is being
> + used on arm64.
>
> Must be supplied if RAS support is provided by the platform. It
> is recommended this table be supplied.
> @@ -149,20 +151,30 @@ IBFT Signature Reserved (signature == "IBFT")
> == iSCSI Boot Firmware Table ==
> Microsoft defined table, support TBD.
>
> +IORT Signature Reserved (signature == "IORT")
> + == Input Output Remapping Table ==
> + arm64 only table, required in order to describe IO topology, SMMUs,
> + and GIC ITSs, and how those various components are connected together,
> + such as identifying which components are behind which SMMUs/ITSs.
> + This table will only be required on certain SBSA platforms (e.g.,
> + when using GICv3-ITS and an SMMU); on SBSA Level 0 platforms, it
> + remains optional.
Hmm, yes, for GICv2 based system, we don't need a IORT table,
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
Thanks
Hanjun
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list