[PATCH 09/10] dt-bindings: Update bindings with additional vendor for LS1012A
Scott Wood
oss at buserror.net
Fri Aug 26 15:42:00 PDT 2016
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 15:57 +0530, Bhaskar Upadhaya wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Upadhaya <Bhaskar.Upadhaya at nxp.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> index a7440bc..e9f923d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ elan Elan Microelectronic Corp.
> embest Shenzhen Embest Technology Co., Ltd.
> emmicro EM Microelectronic
> energymicro Silicon Laboratories (formerly Energy Micro AS)
> +eon Eon Silicon Solution, Inc.
> epcos EPCOS AG
> epfl Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
> epson Seiko Epson Corp.
> @@ -246,6 +247,7 @@ solomon Solomon Systech Limited
> sony Sony Corporation
> spansion Spansion Inc.
> sprd Spreadtrum Communications Inc.
> +sst Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.
> st STMicroelectronics
> startek Startek
> ste ST-Ericsson
What does LS1012A have to do with these vendors? At most your motivation
might be that these chips are on a board that happens to also have an LS1012A
on it, but that doesn't make it an appropriate patch description. Better
would be something like "dt-bindings: Add eon and sst vendor strings" with the
changelog body mentioning that you're documenting prefixes that are already in
use.
-Scott
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list