[PATCH 06/13] scpi: add priv_scpi_ops and fill legacy structure
Sudeep Holla
sudeep.holla at arm.com
Fri Aug 19 09:39:55 PDT 2016
On 18/08/16 11:10, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> In order to use the legacy functions variants, add a new priv_scpi_ops
> structure that will contain the internal alterne functions and then use these
> alternate call in the probe function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> index b0d911b..3fe39fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct scpi_drvinfo {
> struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
> struct scpi_chan *channels;
> struct scpi_dvfs_info *dvfs[MAX_DVFS_DOMAINS];
> + const struct priv_scpi_ops *ops;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -299,6 +300,17 @@ struct dev_pstate_set {
> u8 pstate;
> } __packed;
>
> +struct priv_scpi_ops {
> + /* Internal Specific Ops */
> + void (*handle_remote_msg)(struct mbox_client *c, void *msg);
> + void (*tx_prepare)(struct mbox_client *c, void *msg);
> + /* Message Specific Ops */
> + int (*init_versions)(struct scpi_drvinfo *info);
> + int (*dvfs_get_info)(u8 domain, struct dvfs_info *buf);
> + /* System wide Ops */
> + struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
> +};
> +
I fail to understand the need for this. Can you please explain the issue
you would face without this ?
> static struct scpi_drvinfo *scpi_info;
>
> static int scpi_linux_errmap[SCPI_ERR_MAX] = {
> @@ -695,9 +707,12 @@ static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_dvfs_get_info(u8 domain)
> if (scpi_info->dvfs[domain]) /* data already populated */
> return scpi_info->dvfs[domain];
>
> - ret = scpi_send_message(SCPI_CMD_GET_DVFS_INFO, &domain, sizeof(domain),
> + if (scpi_info->ops && scpi_info->ops->dvfs_get_info)
> + ret = scpi_info->ops->dvfs_get_info(domain, &buf);
> + else
> + ret = scpi_send_message(SCPI_CMD_GET_DVFS_INFO,
> + &domain, sizeof(domain),
> &buf, sizeof(buf));
> -
> if (ret)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> @@ -855,6 +870,22 @@ static struct scpi_ops scpi_ops = {
> .vendor_send_message = scpi_ext_send_message,
> };
>
> +static struct scpi_ops legacy_scpi_ops = {
> + .get_version = scpi_get_version,
> + .clk_get_range = NULL,
> + .clk_get_val = legacy_scpi_clk_get_val,
> + .clk_set_val = legacy_scpi_clk_set_val,
> + .dvfs_get_idx = legacy_scpi_dvfs_get_idx,
> + .dvfs_set_idx = legacy_scpi_dvfs_set_idx,
> + .dvfs_get_info = scpi_dvfs_get_info,
> + .sensor_get_capability = legacy_scpi_sensor_get_capability,
> + .sensor_get_info = legacy_scpi_sensor_get_info,
> + .sensor_get_value = legacy_scpi_sensor_get_value,
> + .device_get_power_state = NULL,
> + .device_set_power_state = NULL,
> + .vendor_send_message = legacy_scpi_send_message,
I think we need not have this at all if you follow the suggestion I had
in the previous patch. Try and let's see how it would look.
> +};
> +
> struct scpi_ops *get_scpi_ops(void)
> {
> return scpi_info ? scpi_info->scpi_ops : NULL;
> @@ -972,8 +1003,17 @@ static int scpi_alloc_xfer_list(struct device *dev, struct scpi_chan *ch)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct priv_scpi_ops scpi_legacy_ops = {
> + .handle_remote_msg = legacy_scpi_handle_remote_msg,
> + .tx_prepare = legacy_scpi_tx_prepare,
> + .init_versions = legacy_scpi_init_versions,
> + .dvfs_get_info = legacy_scpi_dvfs_get_info,
> + .scpi_ops = &legacy_scpi_ops,
> +};
> +
Ditto, can go away.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list