[PATCH] dt-bindings: touchscreen: silead gsl1680: Document all compatibles
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Wed Aug 17 01:58:26 PDT 2016
Hi,
On 17-08-16 04:59, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>
>
> 16.08.2016, 17:06, "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede at redhat.com>:
>> The silead gsl1680 driver / binding supports a whole series of devices,
>> list the compatibles for all of them in the binding.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt
>> index 1112e0d..37a9370 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt
>> @@ -2,6 +2,11 @@
>>
>> Required properties:
>> - compatible : "silead,gsl1680"
>> + or: "silead,gsl1688"
>> + or: "silead,gsl3670"
>> + or: "silead,gsl3675"
>> + or: "silead,gsl3692"
>> + or: "silead,mssl1680"
> I think “mssl1680" is only a string which exists in ACPI tables.
> I have disassembled one of my tablet, which is said to have "MSSL1680" in it in
> ACPI table (a BayTrail tablet). What I got is a plain GSL1680.
> So it shouldn't exist in the compatible list.
Ah, right, I was already wondering about that one I guess mssl stands for
"microsoft silead" (just a guess). Anyways I'll send a v2 dropping it.
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
>> - reg : I2C slave address of the chip (0x40)
>> - interrupt-parent : a phandle pointing to the interrupt controller
>> serving the interrupt for this chip
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list