[PATCH] dt-bindings: touchscreen: silead gsl1680: Document all compatibles

[Icenowy Zheng]

16.08.2016, 17:06, "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede at redhat.com>:
> The silead gsl1680 driver / binding supports a whole series of devices,
> list the compatibles for all of them in the binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt
> index 1112e0d..37a9370 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt
> @@ -2,6 +2,11 @@
>
>  Required properties:
>  - compatible : "silead,gsl1680"
> + or: "silead,gsl1688"
> + or: "silead,gsl3670"
> + or: "silead,gsl3675"
> + or: "silead,gsl3692"
> + or: "silead,mssl1680"
I think “mssl1680" is only a string which exists in ACPI tables.
I have disassembled one of my tablet, which is said to have "MSSL1680" in it in
ACPI table (a BayTrail tablet). What I got is a plain GSL1680.
So it shouldn't exist in the compatible list.
>  - reg : I2C slave address of the chip (0x40)
>  - interrupt-parent : a phandle pointing to the interrupt controller
>                              serving the interrupt for this chip
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel