[PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: add DT binding for Marvell CP110 system controller
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Mon Apr 11 08:59:38 PDT 2016
Hello,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:47:56 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > +Required properties:
> > +
> > + - compatible: must be:
> > + "marvell,cp110-system-controller0", "syscon";
>
> This block is really the same across SoCs?
As per my knowledge, it is the same across 7020, 7040, 8020 and 8040,
where the CP part is named CP110. My understanding is that in future
SoCs, when the CP part will change, the CP part will have a different
name, i.e CP115 or 120 or something (these are invented names, I have
no idea how Marvell will name the future CPs).
So I believe cp110-system-controller0 properly uniquely identifies this
IP block.
> > + - reg: register area of the CP110 system controller 0
> > + - #clock-cells: must be set to 2
> > + - core-clock-output-names must be set to:
> > + "cpm-apll", "cpm-ppv2-core", "cpm-eip", "cpm-core", "cpm-nand-core"
> > + - gatable-clock-indices must be set to:
> > + <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>,
> > + <9>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <18>,
> > + <22>, <23>, <24>, <25>, <26>
>
> You aren't skipping very many spots. I'd just fill the unused names in
> with "none" or something.
and then remove the gatable-clock-indices property altogether?
Thanks for the review!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list