[PATCH v4 0/5] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: rework the timing setup
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Thu Oct 22 08:42:44 PDT 2015
Dear Ezequiel Garcia,
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:22:24 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Could you compare NAND throughput using keep-config (keeping
> the bootloader timings) and without keep-config (with ONFI timings) ?
Seems like we are within the measurement noise. I did each test only
once, and the test lasts only a few seconds, but here are the results:
Without keep-config (i.e ONFI timings) :
# time dd if=/dev/mtd3 of=/dev/null bs=1M
32+0 records in
32+0 records out
real 0m 3.54s
user 0m 0.00s
sys 0m 0.26s
With keep-config (i.e bootloader timings)
# time dd if=/dev/mtd3 of=/dev/null bs=1M
32+0 records in
32+0 records out
real 0m 3.77s
user 0m 0.00s
sys 0m 0.21s
I.e we are apparently slightly faster with the ONFI timings. However
again, the test duration is very short, and I didn't repeat the test
several times.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list